Opinion
April 9, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.).
Ordered that the appeals from the infant compromise order dated September 30, 1988, and the order dated January 31, 1989, respectively, are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as those orders were superseded by the infant compromise order dated March 6, 1989; and it is further,
Ordered that the infant compromise order dated March 6, 1989, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
We find that, under the circumstances of this case, the counsel fees awarded were suitable compensation for the services rendered on behalf of the infant plaintiff (see, Judiciary Law § 474; Rivera v. City of New York, 25 A.D.2d 297).
The appellants' remaining contention is based on matter dehors the record and has not been considered. Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.