From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milano v. City of Walnut Creek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
No. C 11-01516 RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-01516 RS

10-07-2011

GARY MILANO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On March 29, 2011, pro se plaintiff Gary Milano filed a complaint against defendants City of Walnut Creek, Sgt. M. McLaughlin, Officer R. Dickey, and Robert Taylor. Milano did not serve any of the defendants with the summons and complaint as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and therefore none have appeared. Although he subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint on June 24, 2011, he never served the defendants. Furthermore, Milano failed to appear at the initial Case Management Conference, which was held on September 1, 2011. Milano was ordered to show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, to which he did not respond. A hearing was held on October 6, 2011, and Milano again did not appear. The case is therefore DISMISSED for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:

Gary Lee Milano

3710 Lone Tree Way, #113

Antioch, CA 94509

Chambers Staff

Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg


Summaries of

Milano v. City of Walnut Creek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
No. C 11-01516 RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Milano v. City of Walnut Creek

Case Details

Full title:GARY MILANO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-01516 RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)