Milano v. Anderson

2 Citing cases

  1. Grimes v. Medero

    2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6362 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

    written objections to an order of the Support Magistrate, which dismissed her petition for modification of her child support obligation. During the pendency of this appeal, the subject child turned 21 years old and, therefore, the mother's obligation to pay child support ceased (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [a]; Matter of Milano v Anderson, 192 A.D.3d 1668, 1669 [4th Dept 2021]). Moreover, even if the mother succeeded on this appeal, she "would have no avenue to regain any sums [s]he might have overpaid in child support" (Matter of Frederick-Kane v Potter, 187 A.D.3d 1436, 1436 [3d Dept 2020]).

  2. Grimes v. Medero

    210 A.D.3d 1427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

    Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, petitioner mother appeals from an order denying her written objections to an order of the Support Magistrate, which dismissed her petition for modification of her child support obligation. During the pendency of this appeal, the subject child turned 21 years old and, therefore, the mother's obligation to pay child support ceased (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [a] ; Matter of Milano v. Anderson , 192 A.D.3d 1668, 1669, 141 N.Y.S.3d 396 [4th Dept. 2021] ). Moreover, even if the mother succeeded on this appeal, she "would have no avenue to regain any sums [s]he might have overpaid in child support" ( Matter of Frederick-Kane v. Potter , 187 A.D.3d 1436, 1436, 134 N.Y.S.3d 552 [3d Dept. 2020] ).