From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milan Music v. Emmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 8, 2007
37 A.D.3d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 158.

February 8, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered February 22, 2006, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Cinque Cinque, P.C., New York (Robert W. Cinque of counsel), for appellants.

Pryor Cashman Sherman Flynn LLP, New York (Kathryn E. Wagner of counsel), for Emmel Communications Booking, Inc., Violator Management, Inc., Michael Lighty, Chris Lighty and Dave Lighty, respondents.

Reed Smith LLP, New York (Peter D. Raymond of counsel), for Curtis Jackson, respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Buckley and McGuire, JJ.


The parties had contracted for a concert by the artist known as 50 Cent, but the performance was cancelled pursuant to an oral agreement. This cancellation was memorialized in two separate writings, and defendants promptly refunded to plaintiffs their $50,000 deposit for the event. Once an agreement has been rescinded, there can be no claims based on the cancelled agreement unless the right to make such claims is expressly or impliedly reserved within the terms of the rescission ( McCreery v Day, 119 NY 1; see Can-Am Organic Foods v Philips Bus. Sys., 83 AD2d 528). Absent such a reservation here, plaintiffs could not withdraw the cancellation or resurrect the original contract. Moreover, plaintiffs' alleged damages amount to nothing more than conjecture as to what could have been earned had the concert been held. Without a clear demonstration of damages, there can be no claim for breach of contract ( Gordon v Dino Be Laurentiis Corp., 141 AD2d 435, 436).

We have considered plaintiffs' other arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Milan Music v. Emmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 8, 2007
37 A.D.3d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Milan Music v. Emmel

Case Details

Full title:MILAN MUSIC, INC., et al., Appellants, v. EMMEL COMMUNICATIONS BOOKING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 8, 2007

Citations

37 A.D.3d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1166
829 N.Y.S.2d 485

Citing Cases

ZENO GROUP, INC. v. CHARLOTTE WRAY

Furthermore, defendants offer cases and rules on the matter that are inapposite. Milan Music v Emmel…

Williams v. Ashley

In order to state a cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff's allegations…