From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milam v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 26, 2008
262 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 90133.

August 26, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, 07SF-CC00241, Sandra Martinez, Judge.

Edward Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cory Lee Atkins, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.



ORDER


Marlon Milam (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (judgment) denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 24.035(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Milam v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 26, 2008
262 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Milam v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marlon MILAM, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Aug 26, 2008

Citations

262 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Milam v. Steele

The circuit court denied Milam's motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15.…