Opinion
No. 10-73677 Agency No. A089-091-495
01-04-2012
SUGEY GUADARRAMA MILAGROS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Sugey Guadarrama Milagros, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Guadarrama Milagros' motion to reopen because it considered the evidence submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining Guadarrama Milagros did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for the relief sought. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 (1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case for the underlying relief sought). We reject Guadarrama Milagros' contention that the BIA failed to address any of her claims.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.