However, the numerous cases filed in federal courts around the country challenging the use of Session Replay Code suggest Defendant is not alone in this practice. See Mikulsky v. Noom, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-00285-H-MSB, 2024 WL 251171, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024) (noting the “dozens of proposed class actions being litigated in federal courts challenging the use of ‘Session Replay Code.'”); In re TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litig., __F.Supp.3d__, 2024 WL 278987, at *7 n.8 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 25, 2024) (stating session replay code “is widely used by website operators and app developers to track and record how users interact with digital platforms.”); see also Popa v. PSP Group, LLC, No. C23-0294JLR, 2023 WL 7001456, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 24, 2023) (listing “dozens of proposed class actions being litigated in federal court across the country challenging the use of ‘Session Replay Code' to record, save, analyze, and replay internet users' interactions with consumer websites.”)