Opinion
2:22-cv-00403- CDS-BNW
04-19-2022
MICHAEL ANTHONY MIKSA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MUSA INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation; MAHSAM RAZA, an individual; and DOES 1-20, Defendants.
JASON M. WILEY, RYAN S. PETERSEN, WILEY PETERSEN JOHN T. WILSON, (Pro Hac Vice) JENNIFER M. RYNELL, (Pro Hac Vice) LEIGH CAUDLE WHITAKER, (Pro Hac Vice) WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL Attorneys for Defendants, Musa Industries, Inc. And Mahsam Raza Tara U. Teegarden RYAN J. WORKS, TARA U. TEEGARDEN, Attorneys for Plaintiff
JASON M. WILEY, RYAN S. PETERSEN, WILEY PETERSEN JOHN T. WILSON, (Pro Hac Vice) JENNIFER M. RYNELL, (Pro Hac Vice) LEIGH CAUDLE WHITAKER, (Pro Hac Vice) WILSON WHITAKER RYNELL Attorneys for Defendants, Musa Industries, Inc. And Mahsam Raza
Tara U. Teegarden RYAN J. WORKS, TARA U. TEEGARDEN, Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST]
Plaintiff MICHAEL ANTHONY MIKSA (“Miksa”), by and through his counsel of record, the law firm McDonald Carano, and Defendants MUSA INDUSTRIES, INC. (“MUSA”) and MAHSAM RAZA (“Raza”), by and through their counsel of records, the law firms Wilson Whitaker Rynell and Wiley Petersen (collectively, Plaintiff and Defendants referred to herein as “the Parties”), and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, submit the following stipulation to extend the time for Defendants to file responsive pleadings to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 20] filed on March 30, 2022. The Parties have stipulated to an extension up to and including April 28, 2022. In support of the stipulation, the Parties state:
1. On March 3, 2022, Defendants removed this litigation to this Court [ECF No. 1].
2. On March 31, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 20].
3. Defendants' counsel requires additional time to respond to the First Amended Complaint due to the newly alleged claims and counsel's travel schedule around the Easter holiday.
4. Plaintiff's counsel has acknowledged and agreed to the requested extension and said extension will not impact any other litigation deadlines.
5. This is the first request to extend Defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint.
6. The request for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading is not intended to cause any undue delay or prejudice to any party and is not made for an improper purpose.
7. The Parties stipulate that the deadline for Defendants to file their responsive pleadings to the First Amended Complaint shall be extended through April 28, 2022.
MCDONALD CARANO LLP
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.