Mikkilineni v. Stoll

1 Citing case

  1. Mikkilineni v. Stoll

    448 F. App'x 63 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

    Because Mr. Mikkilineni fails to show any evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by the PTO and merely reargues his earlier appeal of the underlying judgment, we affirm. This is the second appeal arising from this case and the background is detailed in Mikkilineni v. Stoll, 410 Fed. Appx. 311 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (First Appeal). To summarize, Mr. Mikkilineni applied for a patent for a "Method of Inducing Sleep" involving "concentrat[ing] upon principal thoughts to calm mind" and the use of certain devices to aid in the method.