From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mignott v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1982
86 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

February 2, 1982


Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fusco, J.), entered October 20, 1981, denying the motion by third-party defendant and fourth-party plaintiff Singer Furniture Company for an order staying the physical examination of plaintiff Toris Mignott and directing that physical examinations of said plaintiff be conducted by both a neurologist and a psychiatrist, reversed, on the law, without costs and disbursements, with a direction that plaintiff Toris Mignott appear for examination by a neurologist and by a psychiatrist as requested by the Singer Company, sued herein as Singer Furniture Company. Plaintiff Toris Mignott has not carried the burden of showing that the examinations sought are improper by merely urging that prejudice flows from the fact that plaintiff intends to call only one doctor, a neuropsychiatrist, while defendants would call more than one physician, to wit a neurologist and a psychiatrist. While the court has broad power to prevent abuse, there is no basis for the claimed abuse in this case and no justification for the court's interference in the choice of experts by the parties. The mere fact that defendant and third-party plaintiff conducted a physical examination of plaintiff Toris Mignott by one expert having the combined disciplines of neurology and psychiatry may not serve to frustrate other parties from choosing to conduct their physical examination of plaintiff by a separate expert from each of these disciplines, i.e., a neurologist and a psychiatrist rather than a neuropsychiatrist. Plaintiff has placed in issue her claimed neurological and psychiatric injuries. No undue prejudice has been demonstrated.

Concur — Sandler, Markewich, Lupiano and Fein, JJ.


I dissent and would affirm on the opinion, at Trial Term, of Justice Louis Fusco.


Summaries of

Mignott v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1982
86 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Mignott v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Case Details

Full title:TORIS MIGNOTT et al., Respondents, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK CO., Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1982

Citations

86 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Starling v. Warshowski

The plaintiff has placed her medical and psychiatric condition at issue by requesting damages for physical as…

Matter of Tiffany M

As such, this section expresses no limitation on the number of examinations permitted; that determination is…