From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mierau v. Turner Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 16, 2012
Civil Action Number 11-cv-02548-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action Number 11-cv-02548-RPM

02-16-2012

ROBERT M. MIERAU, Plaintiff, v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant.


Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In this civil action complaint, Robert M. Mierau alleges that the termination of his employment after more than 22 years of service was in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1140 because it was motivated by an intent to deprive him of his right to pension benefits under the defendant's ERISA Plan. The defendant moved to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In that motion the employer includes a statement of facts with exhibits A and B, being the Cash Balance Retirement Plan and Amendment Number Two. The plaintiff's benefit accruals ended on December 31, 2003, so Mr. Mierau's were vested and only earning's based credits are added, which do not require continued employment. In his opposition to defendant's motion, the plaintiff does not challenge this fact but in the complaint and his response Mr. Mierau contends that he was entitled to unspecified "make-up" payments.

Because the plaintiff has not pleaded facts making a plausible claim for a violation of § 1140, it is

ORDERED that this civil action is dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

BY THE COURT:

_____________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Mierau v. Turner Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 16, 2012
Civil Action Number 11-cv-02548-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Mierau v. Turner Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT M. MIERAU, Plaintiff, v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action Number 11-cv-02548-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 16, 2012)