In Mielcarz, the Pennsylvania Superior Court "explicitly decline[d] to opine on whether CHRIA's nondisclosure requirement is a privilege or whether it merely ensures confidentiality of information."
Summary of this case from Shetayh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.122 EDA 2017
06-22-2018
In re: SUBPOENAS IN CASE OF MIELCARZ v. PIETZSCH
Reversed/Vacated/Remanded.
In Mielcarz, the Pennsylvania Superior Court "explicitly decline[d] to opine on whether CHRIA's nondisclosure requirement is a privilege or whether it merely ensures confidentiality of information."
Summary of this case from Shetayh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Full title:In re: SUBPOENAS IN CASE OF MIELCARZ v. PIETZSCH
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: Jun 22, 2018
NCDA moves to quash the subpoena for investigative information, arguing that "Pennsylvania Courts have…