From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Midwest Athletics & Sports All. v. Ricoh U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2022
No. 2021-2340 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2340

11-07-2022

MIDWEST ATHLETICS AND SPORTS ALLIANCE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. RICOH USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee

PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LISA KOBIALKA; MARK BAGHDASSARIAN, New York, NY. RYAN K. WALSH, Jones Day, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by GEOFFREY K. GAVIN, PARTH MATALIA; JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Washington, DC.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:19-cv-00514-JDW, Judge Joshua D. Wolson.

PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LISA KOBIALKA; MARK BAGHDASSARIAN, New York, NY.

RYAN K. WALSH, Jones Day, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by GEOFFREY K. GAVIN, PARTH MATALIA; JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Washington, DC.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE and PROST, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Midwest Athletics & Sports All. v. Ricoh U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2022
No. 2021-2340 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Midwest Athletics & Sports All. v. Ricoh U.S.

Case Details

Full title:MIDWEST ATHLETICS AND SPORTS ALLIANCE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. RICOH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-2340 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2022)