From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Midtown Realty Inc. v. Greenwood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 10, 1983
431 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-1396.

May 3, 1983. Rehearing Denied June 10, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John Gale, J.

Ainslee R. Ferdie, Coral Gables, and Jeffrey Solomon, Hollywood, for appellants.

Thomas D. Daiello and Michel E. Anderson, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


The summary judgment in favor of the appellee is reversed. The fact that the agreement between the seller, Greenwood, and the brokers, Midtown Realty, Inc. and Abraham, giving the brokers the exclusive right to obtain a purchaser for Greenwood's restaurant, contained the phrase "all equipment as shown paid for included in sale (ice mach[ine] not incl[uded])," but did not contain a complete listing of the equipment shown, did not make the agreement, as the trial court found, so vague and ambiguous as a matter of law as to preclude the brokers' suit thereon to recover a brokerage fee to which they claimed entitlement when Greenwood during the term of the agreement sold the subject property to another.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Midtown Realty Inc. v. Greenwood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 10, 1983
431 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Midtown Realty Inc. v. Greenwood

Case Details

Full title:MIDTOWN REALTY, INC. AND BARBARA ABRAHAM, APPELLANTS, v. IAN GREENWOOD…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 10, 1983

Citations

431 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Midtown Realty, Inc. v. Greenwood

PER CURIAM. Based on the controlling authority of Law Realty, Inc. v. Pagliarudo, 385 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 4th…