" This rule has been followed in the following cases: Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. State et al., 24 Okla. 370, 103 P. 617; St. L. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Williams et al., 25 Okla. 662, 107 P. 428; A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miller, 28 Okla. 109, 114 P. 1104; A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. State et al., 28 Okla. 476, 114 P. 721; Midland Valley Ry. Co. v. State et al., 107 Okla. 234, 232 P. 113; Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission et al., 90 Okla. 84, 216 P. 917; Ex parte Tindall, 102 Okla. 192, 229 P. 125. The foregoing cases are sufficient to show that this court is wedded to the rule that on an appeal from an order of the Corporation Commission, requiring additional facilities in the transportation of freight, if there is evidence reasonably tending to support the order of the Commission, the prima facie presumption of the order being reasonable, just, and correct, and obtaining by reason of section 22, art.
In the case of Midland Valley R. Co. v. State, 107 Okla. 234, 232 P. 113, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma holds: