From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Midgley v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 14, 2020
No. 05-19-00299-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2020)

Opinion

No. 05-19-00299-CR

07-14-2020

KENNETH ALLEMAN MIDGLEY, II, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366-82836-2017

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Molberg, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Schenck

Kenneth Alleman Midgley, II appeals from his conviction for murder. Appellant entered an open plea of guilty, and the trial court assessed punishment at life imprisonment. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. A court of appeals is not required to address the merits of claims raised in a pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). Rather, the Court's duty is to determine whether there are any arguable issues, and, if so, to remand the case to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to address those issues. Id.

After reviewing counsel's brief, appellant's pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court's judgment.

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47
190299F.U05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366-82836-2017.
Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Molberg and Nowell participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered this 14th day of July, 2020.


Summaries of

Midgley v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 14, 2020
No. 05-19-00299-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Midgley v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH ALLEMAN MIDGLEY, II, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jul 14, 2020

Citations

No. 05-19-00299-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2020)