From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Middleton v. State

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Feb 17, 2017
389 P.3d 137 (Haw. Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

applying the Blaisdell standard to a dismissal entered pursuant to HRCP Rule 72

Summary of this case from Erum v. Llego

Opinion

NO. CAAP-13-0002468

02-17-2017

William MIDDLETON, Appellant-Appellant, v. STATE of Hawai‘i, Department of Human Services, Appellee-Appellee

On the briefs: William Middleton, Pro Se Plaintiff-Appellant. Heidi M. Rian and Candace J. Park, Deputy Attorneys General, State of Hawai‘i, for Defendant-Appellee.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Vacate. Remand.


Summaries of

Middleton v. State

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Feb 17, 2017
389 P.3d 137 (Haw. Ct. App. 2017)

applying the Blaisdell standard to a dismissal entered pursuant to HRCP Rule 72

Summary of this case from Erum v. Llego
Case details for

Middleton v. State

Case Details

Full title:William MIDDLETON, Appellant-Appellant, v. STATE of Hawai‘i, Department of…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Feb 17, 2017

Citations

389 P.3d 137 (Haw. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Hilo Project, LLC v. Cnty. of Haw. Windward Planning Comm'n

Prior to January 1, 2012, HRCP Rule 72(f) did not include details regarding opening, answering, reply briefs…

Erum v. Llego

We further note that the ICA has commonly applied the Blaisdell standard in a wide variety of circumstances…