From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Middleton v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 20, 2006
28 A.D.3d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8325N.

April 20, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered November 29, 2004, which denied petitioner's application to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Isaac Middleton, appellant pro se.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence A. Silver of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.


Although apparently unknown to petitioner, a notice of claim was timely served by attorneys he had apparently discharged, rendering the instant application moot. We note that the application was filed after the statute of limitations had run, rendering it time-barred as well ( see Pierson v. City of New York, 56 NY2d 950).


Summaries of

Middleton v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 20, 2006
28 A.D.3d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Middleton v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC MIDDLETON, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 20, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3005
812 N.Y.S.2d 357