However, "that section does not require [the defendant] to do anything." Mid-State Trust IV v.Swift, No. 01-A-01-9703-CV-0014, 1997 WL 379152, at *2 (Tenn.Ct.App. M.S. July 9, 1997). Even if the plaintiff does not avail himself of the writ of possession, and suffers the defendant to remain in possession, the defendant is not required to post an additional bond for rents. Hawkins v. Alexander, 91 Tenn. 359, 18 S.W. 882, 882 (1892); see alsoLynn v. Tellico Mfg. Co., 76 Tenn. 29 (1881).