Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

Full title: MID-COUNTY FUTURE ALTERNATIVES COMMITTEE, Peter M. Smith and Dorothy…

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 17, 1991

809 P.2d 1360 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

809 P.2d 1360

Opinion

2278, 2279, 2281, 2282, 2283, 2309, 2310, 2324, 2353, 2355, 2356, 2584, 2577; CA A41958 (Control), A41959, A41961, A41962, A41963, A42549, A42550, A43140, A44286, A44288, A44289, A60690, A60691 (Cases Consolidated)

Argued and submitted March 18, 1991.

Affirmed April 17, 1991

Judicial Review from Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission.

Gregory W. Byrne, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. On the briefs was George E. Birnie, Portland.

Michael D. Reynolds, Assistant Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Linda DeVries Grimms, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Jeffrey L. Rogers, City Attorney, and Adrianne Brockman, Senior Deputy City Attorney, Portland, filed the brief for respondent City of Portland.

Matthew R. Baines, Assistant City Attorney, Gresham, argued the cause for respondent City of Gresham. With him on the brief was Thomas Sponsler, City Attorney, Gresham.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Mid-County Future v. Port. Metro. Area LGBC (A47426), 106 Or. App. 647, 809 P.2d 1354 (1991).