From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 17, 1991
809 P.2d 1359 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

2296, 2466, 2432; CA A42257 (Control), A47809, A48434 (Cases Consolidated)

Argued and submitted March 18, 1991.

Affirmed April 17, 1991.

Judicial Review from Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission.

Gregory W. Byrne, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. On the briefs was George E. Birnie, Portland.

Michael D. Reynolds, Assistant Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Linda DeVries Grimms, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Jeffrey L. Rogers, City Attorney, and Adrianne Brockman, Deputy City Attorney, Portland, filed the brief for respondent City of Portland.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.


Affirmed. Mid-County Future v. Port. Metro. Area LGBC (A47426), 106 Or. App. 647, 809 P.2d 1354 (1991).


Summaries of

Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 17, 1991
809 P.2d 1359 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

Case Details

Full title:MID-COUNTY FUTURE ALTERNATIVES COMMITTEE, Peter M. Smith and Dorothy…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 17, 1991

Citations

809 P.2d 1359 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
809 P.2d 1359