From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Micolo v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2017
147 A.D.3d 1131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

02-02-2017

In the Matter of Marcus A. MICOLO, Petitioner, v. Michael KIRKPATRICK, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Marcus A. Micolo, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Marcus A. Micolo, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of providing unauthorized legal assistance. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Arriaga v. Capra, 144 A.D.3d 1303, 1303, 40 N.Y.S.3d 301 [2016]; Matter of Simmons v. Kirkpatrick, 142 A.D.3d 1245, 1245, 37 N.Y.S.3d 717 [2016] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., EGAN JR., DEVINE, MULVEY and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Micolo v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 2, 2017
147 A.D.3d 1131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Micolo v. Kirkpatrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Marcus A. MICOLO, Petitioner, v. Michael KIRKPATRICK, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 2, 2017

Citations

147 A.D.3d 1131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
147 A.D.3d 1131
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 697

Citing Cases

Thousand v. Kirkpatrick

Additionally, "petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary…