From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mickenzie v. Decker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 24, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-13-0966 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-13-0966

04-24-2013

LAXY MICKENZIE, Petitioner v. THOMAS DECKER, Respondents


(Judge Mannion)


ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 24th DAY OF APRIL, 2013, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED, without prejudice as premature.
2. The petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 2).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

______________

MALACHY E. MANNION

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mickenzie v. Decker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 24, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-13-0966 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Mickenzie v. Decker

Case Details

Full title:LAXY MICKENZIE, Petitioner v. THOMAS DECKER, Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-13-0966 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 24, 2013)