From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mickens v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson Division
Feb 22, 2006
C/A No. 6:05-CV-03002-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2006)

Opinion

C/A No. 6:05-CV-03002-GRA.

February 22, 2006


ORDER (Written Opinion)


Petitioner brought this action seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On December 7, 2005, the government filed a motion for summary judgment. By order of this Court filed December 28, 2005, pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), Petitioner was advised of the summary judgment procedure and the possible consequences if he failed to respond adequately. Despite this explanation, Petitioner did not respond. The Court filed a second order on February 28, 2005, giving Petitioner ten additional days to file a response. The Court's order specifically advised Petitioner that "if he fails to respond, this action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)." Petitioner did not respond.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mickens v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson Division
Feb 22, 2006
C/A No. 6:05-CV-03002-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Mickens v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Sandy Alexander Mickens, Petitioner, v. United States of America…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson Division

Date published: Feb 22, 2006

Citations

C/A No. 6:05-CV-03002-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2006)