Opinion
No. 124478.
March 25, 2004.
Leave to Appeal Denied.
No. 124478. In further proceedings, the parties are advised to consider (1) whether, in the first instance, defendants breached their common-law duty to plaintiff to protect her from unreasonable risks of harm caused by dangerous conditions on the premises that defendants knew or should have known plaintiff would not discover, realize, or protect herself against, see Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc, 449 Mich 606, 609 (1995), and (2) the applicability of MCL 554.139(1)(a) and (b) to the facts of this case. Court of Appeals No. 208269.