From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mickelson v. Holinka

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 3, 2007
Civil No. 06-4261 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Aug. 3, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-4261 (JNE/SRN).

August 3, 2007

James R. Mickelson, pro se

William H. Koch, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Respondent.


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Accordingly, based on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED; and
2. Petitioner's Motion Seeking Relief by Way of § 2241 Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Mickelson v. Holinka

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 3, 2007
Civil No. 06-4261 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Aug. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Mickelson v. Holinka

Case Details

Full title:James R. Mickelson, Petitioner, v. Carol Holinka, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 3, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-4261 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Aug. 3, 2007)

Citing Cases

Waters v. Rios

The vast majority of courts directly addressing this issue have concluded that a habeas petition is not the…