From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MICHIGAN TOOLING A WORK COMP FUND v. FARMINGTON IN AG

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 20, 2006
474 Mich. 1010 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

No. 127834.

January 20, 2006.


Summary Dispositions.

SC: 127834, COA: 249013.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for entry of judgment in favor of Farmington Insurance Agency, LLC. MCR 7.302(G)(1). Farmington Insurance Agency did not owe a duty to Distel Tool Machine Company because it could not have reasonably foreseen that Distel would rely on a certificate of insurance that was issued to another company. In all other respects, the application is denied, because this disposition renders moot the remaining question presented.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ. We would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

MICHIGAN TOOLING A WORK COMP FUND v. FARMINGTON IN AG

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 20, 2006
474 Mich. 1010 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

MICHIGAN TOOLING A WORK COMP FUND v. FARMINGTON IN AG

Case Details

Full title:MICHIGAN TOOLING ASSOCIATION WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND, as Subrogee of…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jan 20, 2006

Citations

474 Mich. 1010 (Mich. 2006)
708 N.W.2d 370