Opinion
No. 112742.
June 2, 1999.
It is unnecessary to decide the question of whether Standard D is met by a substantial reduction in funds originally from the federal government because, on the facts of this case, the evidence indicates that there will be no reduction in amounts received from the federal government and the entire savings will be in amounts which would have otherwise been paid from the state general fund. Court of Appeals No. 206506.
CAVANAGH, J.
I would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Leave to Appeal Denied June 2, 1999: