Opinion
May, 1907.
Order affirmed, with costs. Held, that while the evidence specified in the order was competent the order should be affirmed for other errors in the reception of evidence. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Michigan Buggy Co. v. Camden Wagon and Sleigh Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Summaries of
Michigan Buggy Co. v. Camden Wagon and Sleigh Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for
Michigan Buggy Co. v. Camden Wagon and Sleigh Co.
Case Details
Full title:Michigan Buggy Company, Respondent, v. Camden Wagon and Sleigh Company…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1907
Citations
119 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)