From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michener v. Borough of Mount Oliver Jim Cassidy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-0746 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-0746

10-10-2012

BETTY MICHENER, Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF MOUNT OLIVER JIM CASSIDY, Defendants.


Judge Gary L. Lancaster


ORDER

AND NOW, this ___Day of ___ 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's DEFENDANTS' THIRD MOTION TO COMPEL, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's allegations against each of the Defendants Farneth, Malloy, Cassidy, Obeldobel, and Bender, shall be deemed to be limited to those matters arising from and described by the documents Plaintiff has tendered in Response to Defendants' Requests for Production of Documents, which Plaintiff served upon Defendants on March 19, 2012.

_________________


Summaries of

Michener v. Borough of Mount Oliver Jim Cassidy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-0746 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Michener v. Borough of Mount Oliver Jim Cassidy

Case Details

Full title:BETTY MICHENER, Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF MOUNT OLIVER JIM CASSIDY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-0746 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2012)