Summary
dismissing Plaintiff's appeal from Defendant Gage's Motion to Dismiss because "[t]he order Michelson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order."
Summary of this case from Michelson v. DuncanOpinion
No. 18-7221
02-26-2019
Christopher Lee Michelson, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00050-FDW) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Lee Michelson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher Lee Michelson appeals the district court's order dismissing his claims against one but not all defendants, and denying various motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Michelson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED