Opinion
24-11200
08-27-2024
MICHELE V., Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
Honorable Thomas L. Ludington
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 10)
Elizabeth A. Stafford United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Michele V. moved for a 45-day extension of the briefing schedule to file a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 10. She states that the Commissioner does not object. Id., PageID.1388. The Honorable Thomas L. Ludington referred the case to the undersigned for all non-dispositive motions under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). ECF No. 9.
Because plaintiff's motion for more time was made before the deadline to file her brief, the good cause standard applies. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(1)(A) (court may grant an extension for good cause if the request is made before the original deadline). Plaintiff has shown good cause.
The amended schedule is as follows:
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 10/10/2024
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 11/12/2024
Plaintiff's Reply 11/26/2024
IT IS SO ORDERED.
NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS
Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file objections with the assigned district judge. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). The district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636. “When an objection is filed to a magistrate judge's ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the magistrate judge or a district judge.” E.D. Mich. LR 72.2.