From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michel v. Gipson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P

02-07-2023

FABIAN HANCY MICHEL, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed a change of address and the findings and recommendations were re-served on December 22, 2022. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 16, 2022, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Michel v. Gipson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Michel v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:FABIAN HANCY MICHEL, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)