From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michaud v. Crawford

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 7, 2006
Case No. 3:04-CV-00713-KJD (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04-CV-00713-KJD (VPC).

March 7, 2006


ORDER


Presently before the Court for consideration are the Report and Recommendation (#34) of Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke entered January 25, 2006, recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#26) be granted and Plaintiff's Complaint (#4) dismissed without prejudice with leave to re-file to allege only those claims that have been fully exhausted administratively. The parties had ten (10) days from receipt to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The time to file objections has passed and neither party has filed such. Moreover, the Court has reviewed the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered January 25, 2006, should be adopted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (#34) of Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke entered January 25, 2006, is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#26) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (#4) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to re-file. Plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days from the entry of this order to re-file his complaint alleging only those claims that have been fully exhausted administratively.


Summaries of

Michaud v. Crawford

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 7, 2006
Case No. 3:04-CV-00713-KJD (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Michaud v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MICHAUD, Plaintiff, v. JACKIE CRAWFORD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:04-CV-00713-KJD (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 7, 2006)