From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michalak v. Venticinque

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiff's motion for a protective order precluding the deposition of Dr. Bartz (see, CPLR 3103). "[A] defendant in a personal injury action may [not], as of right, depose any and all physicians who are shown to have treated the injuries claimed by the plaintiff" (Dioguardi v St. John's Riverside Hosp., 144 A.D.2d 333, 334). Further, a party seeking discovery from a non-party expert witness must show "special circumstances" (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]). Allegations that the information sought is relevant and material are insufficient (Cirale v 80 Pine St. Corp., 35 N.Y.2d 113, 116-117). It must also be shown that the information sought "cannot be discovered from other sources or otherwise is necessary to prepare for trial [citation omitted]" (King v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 198 A.D.2d 748; see, Dioguardi v St. John's Riverside Hosp., supra, at 334). Dr. Bartz supplied defendants with a letter and sworn statement chronicling his treatment of plaintiff, including the date of each treatment and plaintiff's physical complaints. Defendants failed to show that the deposition of Dr. Bartz might yield information material to the issue of damages that is not otherwise available.


Summaries of

Michalak v. Venticinque

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Michalak v. Venticinque

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH MICHALAK, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 875

Citing Cases

Sheehan v. Pantelidis

That ruling is law of the case and defendant offers no persuasive reason to reconsider it, In any event,…

Patterson v. St. Francis Center, the Knolls

In this personal injury action, the defendants served a subpoena on one of the injured plaintiff's treating…