From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michael v. Golden Dolphin Enterprises

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2646.

May 16, 1990.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; Rupert J. Smith, Judge.

Robert Charles McClain, Melbourne, for appellant.

Rick M. Rodgers of Goldman, Bruning Angelos, P.A., Port St. Lucie, for appellee.


We affirm the order holding appellant in contempt. According to the Agreed Statement of the Case the motion for contempt was based upon the allegation that appellant had violated the temporary injunction, by a specific act prohibited by the injunction order in which he was a named party. The trial court's order finds that appellant, an individual, violated the injunction. While appellant contends that he cannot be found individually liable for the acts of his corporation, which was also named in the contempt citation, we can only interpret the facts and the judgment as finding that he personally committed the act warranting the order of contempt.

LETTS, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Michael v. Golden Dolphin Enterprises

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Michael v. Golden Dolphin Enterprises

Case Details

Full title:DAN MICHAEL, APPELLANT, v. GOLDEN DOLPHIN ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 16, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)