From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MICHAEL S. RULLE FAM. DYNASTY TR. v. AGL LIFE ASSURANCE

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 7, 2010
CIVIL ACTION, No. 10-231 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION, No. 10-231.

July 7, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant AGL Life Assurance Company's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's response thereto, Defendant's reply thereon, and for the reasons contained in this Court's Memorandum dated July 7, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Document No. 22) is GRANTED in part.
2. Counts I, III, IV, and V of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint are DISMISSED.
3. The Parties shall file additional briefing on the Choice of Law issue on or before July 28, 2010. Such briefs shall not exceed twenty pages.
a. Each Party may, but is not required to, file a response thereto on or before August 6, 2010.
b. Any response shall not exceed ten pages.


Summaries of

MICHAEL S. RULLE FAM. DYNASTY TR. v. AGL LIFE ASSURANCE

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 7, 2010
CIVIL ACTION, No. 10-231 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2010)
Case details for

MICHAEL S. RULLE FAM. DYNASTY TR. v. AGL LIFE ASSURANCE

Case Details

Full title:THE MICHAEL S. RULLE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST, Plaintiff, v. AGL LIFE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 7, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION, No. 10-231 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2010)

Citing Cases

MICHAEL S. RULLE FAM. DYNASTY TR. v. AGL LIFE ASSURANCE

But, as made clear by the Court in its previous Memorandum, AGL did not maintain exclusive control over the…

2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Phila. Fin. Life Assurance Co.

See Gentile, 922 P.2d at 261. The Court also finds the reasoning in Michael S. Rulle Family Dynasty Trust v.…