When ruling on a motion to dismiss, the court is required to view the facts in the light most favorable to SunTrust, and JPMorgan's argument would turn that requirement on its head. See Fedorchak v. Montgomery Ward, 18 F.R.D. 1, 3 (M.D. Pa. 1955) (refusing to dismiss third-party complaint merely because its allegations were inconsistent with those in plaintiff's complaint).