From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Micenheimer v. Finander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2018
Case No. CV 16-4314-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-4314-CJC (JEM)

01-24-2018

CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, Plaintiff, v. P. FINANDER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. DATED: January 24, 2018

/s/_________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Micenheimer v. Finander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2018
Case No. CV 16-4314-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Micenheimer v. Finander

Case Details

Full title:CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, Plaintiff, v. P. FINANDER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 16-4314-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2018)