From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miceli v. Reily

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1976
54 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 25, 1976


In an action inter alia to recover possession of real property, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 12, 1976, which, inter alia, denied the branch of her motion which sought to renew her application to compel defendants' attorney to appear at an examination before trial as a witness. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We previously held that an attorney's verification of a pleading does not subject him to examination before trial as a witness (Miceli v Riley, 51 A.D.2d 972). Plaintiff renews her motion herein for such examination and for other relief, alleging new facts, but these new facts do not warrant the relief sought. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miceli v. Reily

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1976
54 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Miceli v. Reily

Case Details

Full title:GIACOMA MICELI, Appellant, v. ARTHUR REILY et al., Respondents, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Miceli v. Reilly

At the time this motion was made, a motion by plaintiff-appellant for similar relief was pending before…