From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Micarelli v. Regal Apparel Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1976
52 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Summary

vacating default judgment necessary to comport with due process

Summary of this case from Topliff v. Chicago Ins. Co.

Opinion

April 1, 1976


Order entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on December 3, 1975, granting defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to respondent. In this action to recover commissions, plaintiff served a summons with notice upon the Secretary of State, pursuant to CPLR 311 (subd 1) and subdivision (b) of section 306 Bus. Corp. of the Business Corporation Law. Due to a staff error, the summons was not mailed to the defendant. Contrary to defendant's assertions, Special Term reached the right result for the right reason. Service of process was complete when the Secretary of State was served. (Cascione v Acme Equip. Corp., 23 A.D.2d 49.) The court, therefore, acquired jurisdiction even though the summons was not forwarded to the defendant. (National Mfg. Corp. v Buffalo Metal Container Corp., 204 Misc. 269; 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac, par 311.09; see, also, Mullane v Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314.) Defendant's right of due process was not violated since it was afforded an opportunity to vacate the default upon the showing of a meritorious defense. (See Wakerman Leather Co. v Foster Sportswear Co., 27 A.D.2d 767.) We find no abuse of discretion by the court below. The affidavit of merits was adequate. The default was clearly excusable and the defendant is entitled to its day in court.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.


Summaries of

Micarelli v. Regal Apparel Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1976
52 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

vacating default judgment necessary to comport with due process

Summary of this case from Topliff v. Chicago Ins. Co.
Case details for

Micarelli v. Regal Apparel Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MICARELLI, Appellant, v. REGAL APPAREL LTD., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

In re Cohoes Indus. Terminal, Inc.

Augusta Lumber Supply, Inc. v. Herbert H. Sabbeth Corp., 101 A.D.2d 846, 475 N.Y.S.2d 878 (2d Dep't 1984)…

Vazquez v. Sund Emba AB

The latter's failure to forward one to the corporation does not void the service.' A fortiori, if the…