Opinion
2:24-cv-00663-BAT
08-28-2024
M.G. a minor, by and through her parents J.G. and other, C.G., Plaintiff, v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on its own motion. On July 3, 2024, the Court granted Defendant's motion to modify the briefing schedule. Dkt. 11. Plaintiff did not respond to the motion. The Court found good cause to grant the motion as Plaintiff's complaint neither identifies the specific issues to be reviewed nor the grounds upon which Plaintiff contends the ALJ erred. Id. In modifying the briefing schedule, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an opening brief or motion by August 19, 2024. Id.
Plaintiff failed to file an opening brief or request a continuance. Therefore, on August 22, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's July 3, 2024 Order. The Order to Show Cause stated “Cause will be shown if Plaintiffs file their opening brief by Monday, August 26, 2024. Dkt. 12. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's Order to Show Cause.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) (allowing for involuntary dismissal for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with the federal rules or court orders); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (courts may dismiss cases sua sponte under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute); Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992) (“The district judge has an obligation to warn the plaintiff that dismissal is imminent.”); Villalobos v. Vilsack, 601 Fed.Appx. 551, 552 (9th Cir. 2015) (upholding district court's dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute after the plaintiff failed to respond to the court's order to show cause).