From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. Pope

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 18, 2009
No. CIV S-03-0241 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 18, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0241 LKK GGH P.

May 18, 2009


ORDER


This matter came on for a status conference on May 14, 2009. Kelly Smith appeared in person on behalf of plaintiff; defendants Shasta County, et al., were represented at the conference telephonically by Gary Brickwood. The parties' counsel have agreed to a settlement conference and would have availability for such a conference in June of 2009, late August of 2009, or immediately thereafter. Following the status conference, the court makes the following ORDERS:

1. This matter is to be set for a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge other than the undersigned;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign another Magistrate Judge for purposes of holding a settlement conference in this case; and

3. Discovery, or the question of re-opened discovery, in this remanded case is stayed, pending the outcome of the settlement conference.


Summaries of

Meyers v. Pope

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 18, 2009
No. CIV S-03-0241 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Meyers v. Pope

Case Details

Full title:TERRY JAY MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF JIM POPE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 18, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0241 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 18, 2009)