Opinion
No. 19-6189 No. 19-6191 No. 19-6198
07-03-2019
DAVID MEYERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOVERNOR RALPH NORTHAM, Governor of Virginia, Defendant - Appellee. DAVID MEYERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR HAROLD CLARKE; KEITH DAWKINS; GAIL JONES; CENTRAL CLASSIFICATION SERVICES VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. DAVID MEYERS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LITIGATION UNIT; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; SUPERINTENDENT OF THE VIRGINIA STATE POLICE; WISE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; WISE COUNTY MAGISTRATE; WISE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY MAGISTRATE; BRUNSWICK COUNTY MAGISTRATE; TAZEWELL COUNTY MAGISTRATE; L. GREEN, Brunswick Commonwealth Attorney; PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; TAZEWELL COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; WISE COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, Defendants - Appellees.
David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge; Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00473-MFU-RSB; 7:17-cv-00201-GEC-PMS; 7:17-cv-00206-GEC-PMS) Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, David Meyers appeals the district court's orders denying his postjudgment motion to seal. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978) (stating standard of review); In re Application & Affidavit for a Search Warrant, 923 F.2d 324, 326 (4th Cir. 1991) (same). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED