From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. New York City Railway Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1906
52 Misc. 650 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

December, 1906.

Harcourt Bull, for appellant.

James L. Quackenbush, for respondent.


This case comes directly within the authority of our decision in the case of Lewis v. New York City R. Co., handed down at the May Term, 1906, and reported in 50 Misc. 535.

For the reasons there stated the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: GILDERSLEEVE, FITZGERALD and DAVIS, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Meyers v. New York City Railway Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1906
52 Misc. 650 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

Meyers v. New York City Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN MEYERS, Appellant, v . THE NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1906

Citations

52 Misc. 650 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)