From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. K Byte-Hibbing Manufacturing

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 1, 2006
713 N.W.2d 41 (Minn. 2006)

Opinion

No. A06-154.

May 1, 2006.

Appeal from Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals.

Thomas R. Longfellow, Stacie R. McBride-Cox, Longfellow Law Office, St. Paul, MN, for Appellant.

Thomas L. Cummings, Jardine, Logan O'Brien, P.L.L.P., Lake Elmo, MN, for Respondent.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Curiae.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 22, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice


Summaries of

Meyers v. K Byte-Hibbing Manufacturing

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 1, 2006
713 N.W.2d 41 (Minn. 2006)
Case details for

Meyers v. K Byte-Hibbing Manufacturing

Case Details

Full title:Donald A. MEYERS, Relator, v. K BYTE-HIBBING MANUFACTURING, and TIG…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: May 1, 2006

Citations

713 N.W.2d 41 (Minn. 2006)