From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. Jacobs

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jan 14, 2022
1:21CV855 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2022)

Opinion

1:21CV855

01-14-2022

DAVID MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. MR. JACOBS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, submitted a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and, later, an application to proceed in forma pauperis and an Amended Complaint. The form of the Complaint and Amended Complaint are such that serious flaws make it impossible to further process them. The problems are:

1. The filing fee was not received nor was a proper affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis submitted, with sufficient information completed and signed by Plaintiff, to permit review. Plaintiff submitted an in forma pauperis application, but did not use the proper form for prisoners as required by this Court.

2. The Complaint and Amended Complaint are not on forms prescribed for use by this Court, nor is the information requested by such forms and necessary to process the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A contained in Plaintiff's submissions. See LR 7.1(d).

Consequently, the Complaint should be dismissed, but without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects of the present action. To further aid Plaintiff, the Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff new § 1 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed In forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above.


Summaries of

Meyers v. Jacobs

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jan 14, 2022
1:21CV855 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Meyers v. Jacobs

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. MR. JACOBS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 14, 2022

Citations

1:21CV855 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2022)