From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 28, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1276 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1276

08-28-2012

DANIEL EDWARD MEYERS Plaintiff v. GARY D. ALEXANDER, JR., et al. Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

Before the court in the captioned action is an August 8, 2012 report of the magistrate judge. No timely objections have been filed.

Accordingly, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson.

2) Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiff endeavoring to correct the defects cited in this report, provided that the plaintiff acts within 20 days of the date of this order.

3) If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

4) If Plaintiff files an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order, all further proceedings in this matter are referred to Magistrate Judge Carlson.

_______________

YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Meyers v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 28, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1276 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Meyers v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL EDWARD MEYERS Plaintiff v. GARY D. ALEXANDER, JR., et al. Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1276 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2012)