From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Southampton Art Partners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 30, 1993
199 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 30, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).


Dismissal of the complaint is appropriate when a plaintiff repeatedly and willfully disobeys the court's successive discovery orders (Kogan v Royal Indem. Co., 179 A.D.2d 399). Since plaintiff herein repeatedly failed to appear at scheduled depositions, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to dismiss the complaint.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Meyer v. Southampton Art Partners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 30, 1993
199 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Meyer v. Southampton Art Partners, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CATALINA MEYER, Appellant, v. SOUTHAMPTON ART PARTNERS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
606 N.Y.S.2d 7

Citing Cases

Zimmon v. Somers

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.). The willfulness of plaintiffs' failure…

Soto-Law v. Law

We agree with the motion court that if Richard and his brother Arthur are guilty of participating in the…