From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Santander Consumer USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2786 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2786 LKK GGH PS

08-17-2011

LORENA MEYER, Plaintiff, v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On August 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for the court to direct the U.S. Marshal to serve process on defendant. Plaintiff is informed that the Marshal was directed to serve process by this court's order of July 1, 2011. In that order, the U.S. Marshall was given ninety days to serve process. That ninety day period has not yet expired.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: plaintiff's request for order directing service, filed August 10, 2011, (dkt. # 16), is denied as premature.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Meyer v. Santander Consumer USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2786 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Meyer v. Santander Consumer USA

Case Details

Full title:LORENA MEYER, Plaintiff, v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 17, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2786 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)